Mismatched Related Donor Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
T
Toshihiro Onishi, MD
Primary Investigator
Enrolling By Invitation
6-21 years
All
Phase
3
435 participants needed
1 Location
Brief description of study
What is the purpose of this study?
This phase III trial compares hematopoietic (stem) cell transplantation (HCT) usinghed related donors (haploidentical [haplo]) versus matched unrelated donors (MUD) ing children, adolescents, and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplasticyndrome (MDS). HCT is considered standard of care treatment for patients with high-riskute leukemia and MDS. In HCT, patients are given very high doses of chemotherapy ordiation therapy, which is intended to kill cancer cells that may be resistant to moredard doses of chemotherapy; unfortunately, this also destroys the normal cells in the
bone marrow, including stem cells. After the treatment, patients must have a healthy supplyduced or transplanted. The transplanted cells then reestablish the bloodduction process in the bone marrow. The healthy stem cells may come from the blood or
bone marrow of a related or unrelated donor. If patients do not have a matched related donor,
doctors do not know what the next best donor choice is or if a haplo related donor or MUD is
better. This trial may help researchers understand whether a haplo related donor or a MUD HCThildren with acute leukemia or MDS is better or if there is no difference at all.
THIS STUDY IS ENROLLING BY INVITATION ONLY - Consistent with most oncology trials, patients are not actively “recruited,” but are screened by their physician for appropriate clinical trial(s) at the time of their routine clinic visit. Occasionally, a patient may be a self-referral or physician referral, but are still screened for appropriate clinical trials at the time of their routine clinic visit. PI and staff may send copies of relevant consent forms to these patients to look over prior to actually consenting or enrolling them. This may take place at the patient's visit at which the consent is presented or the patient's next visit to the outpatient hematology/oncology clinic.
Interested in participating? For more information about this research study or other cancer-related clinical trials at IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, please contact:
IU Clinical Trials Office
Email: iutrials@iu.edu
Phone: (317) 278-5632
Detailed description of study
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the 1-year cumulative incidence of severe Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
(from day of HCT) defined as grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and/or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) thatquires systemic immunosuppression and to compare the disease free survival (DFS) (from timedomization) in children and young adults (AYA) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acuteymphoid leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are randomly assigned to
haploHCT or to an 8/8 adult MUD-HCT.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare overall survival (OS) between children and AYA with AML/ALL/MDS randomlygned to haploHCT and MUD HCT.
II. To compare differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between haploHCT and MUD
HCT from baseline (pre-transplant), at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-transplant.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the median time to engraftment and cumulative incidences of neutrophilgraftment at 30 and 100 days post transplant and platelet engraftment at 60 and 100 daysy graft failure by 60 days, secondary graft failure at 1 year postGrade II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) requiring systemicunosuppression at 100 days and 6 months, and cumulative incidences of transplant-relatedy (TRM), relapse, and moderate and severe chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD)6 months, 1 and 2 years after haploHCT and MUD HCT.
II. To estimate 1 year, 18-month and 2-year cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease
(GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) with events defined as occurrence of any of thewing from Day 0 of HCT: Grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemicunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause.
IIa. To compare "chronic GVHD" (GRFS) after haploHCT and MUD HCT using landmark definitions.
IIb. To compare "current" GRFS is defined as the time to onset of any of the following eventsDay 0 of HCT: Grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD that is STILL requiring systemicunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse or progression, death from any cause at 18hs and 2 years.
III. To evaluate the influence of key clinical variables: age (<13 years and 13-21.99 years),
disease (ALL versus [vs.] AML/MDS), haploHCT approach (TCR alpha beta + T cell depletion vs.yclophosphamide [PTCy]); donor age (by ten-year increments), donor sex
(maternal vs. paternal for parental donation), pre-HCT minimal residual disease status (MRD +
vs MRD -); pediatric disease risk index (low, intermediate, and high, impact on OS and DFSy), conditioning regimen (chemotherapy based versus total-body irradiation [TBI] based),unosuppressive regimen (anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG] exposure according to the weight andbsolute lymphocyte count [ALC] dependent dosing approach vs no ATG exposure) time to(interval between diagnosis/relapse and date of stem cell infusion) graft cell
dose, use of relapse prevention therapy (yes or no) and weight on engraftment, OS, DFS, GRFS,d mortality (TRM), aGvHD and cGvHD at 1 and 2 years after haplo andD HCT by performing stratified and multivariate analyses.
IV. To compare other important transplant related outcomes after haplo and MUD HCT, such as:
IVa. Incidence of any significant fungal infections (defined as proven or probable fungal) through 1 year post HCT; IVb. Incidence of viremia with or without end organ
disease (i.e. cytomegalovirus [CMV], adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus [EBV], human herpesvirus
6 [HHV-6], BK) requiring hospitalization and/or systemic antiviral therapy and/or cellherapy through 1 year post HCT; IVc. Incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)hrough 100 days post HCT; IVd. As defined by the Cairo criteria; IVe. To compare thedence and outcome of SOS when different criteria are used (European Bone Marrow
Transplant [EBMT], Cairo, Baltimore, and modified Seattle criteria); IVf. Incidence ofd thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) through 100 days post HCT.
V. To compare immune recovery after haplo PTCy, haplo alpha-beta T cell depletion, and MUD
HCT via:
Va. Pace of reconstitution of T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells and immunoglobulins at 30
days, 60 days, 100 days, 180 days and 365 days after HCT; Vb. Response to vaccinations as
determined by vaccination-specific antibody titers at 12-18 months post hematopoietic stem(HSCT); Vc. Biobanking blood or marrow to analyze the impact of graftGvHD, relapse and viremia; Vd. Biobanking whole blood and serum to compareune recovery using extended immune phenotyping and immune functional assessments.
VI. Biobanking whole blood or serum to measure rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) exposure
when dosed according to weight and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) using establishedharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics assays (after last infusion, Day -4, Day 0, Day +7).
VII. To compare resource utilization after haplo and MUD HCT. VIIa. Length of HCT hospitaly from Day 0 and readmissions within the first 100 days (number of readmissions, duration,d reason).
VIIb. Inpatient costs within the first 100 days and at 2 years post HCT. VIII. To described compare outcomes (neutrophil and platelet engraftment, graft failure, OS, DFS, GRFS, NRM,GvHD and health-related quality of life [HRQOL] post HCT) by recipient/ethnicity, area-based socioeconomic (SES) status, annual household income, primaryken language and conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA).
IX. To describe HRQoL outcomes in racial/ethnic minorities and compare HRQoL outcomes between
White patients receiving haploHCT and racial/ethnic minority patients receiving haploHCT.
What will happen during the study?
- Patients who have both a MUD and haplo donor are randomized to Arm A or Arm B. Patients who only have a haplo donor are nonrandomly assigned to Arm C.
- ARM A: Patients receive a haplo HCT following a TBI- based or chemotherapy-basedyeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or alpha beta T cell depletion (center'shoice). When PTCy is used, it Is administered on days 3 and 4 after HCT and additionalunsouppression is started on day 5 after SCT.
- ARM B: Patients receive a MUD HCT following a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablativeditioning regimen between days -9 and -2 Patients then receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 1-11.
- ARM C: Patients receive a haploHCT following a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablativeditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion (center's choice). When PTCy is used, itdministered on days 3 and 4 after HCT and additional immunsouppression is started on day 5 after SCT.
- Patients in all arms undergo standard HCT screening prior to transplant including diseasevaluation (lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration), and organ function evaluation including but not limited to echocardiogram (ECHO)or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA), PFTS, and bloodwork.Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.
- After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years HCT.
Eligibility of study
You may be eligible for this study if you meet the following criteria:
- Conditions: Riley, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
-
Age: Between 6 Months - 21 Years
-
Gender: All
Inclusion Criteria:
- 6 months to < 22 years at enrollment
- Diagnosed with ALL, AML, or MDS for which an allogeneic hematopoietic stem celldicated. Complete Remission (CR) status will not be confirmed at the. CR as defined in these sections is required to proceed with theual HCT treatment plan
- Has not received a prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Does not have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor availabledonation
- Has an eligible haploidentical related family donor based on at least intermediateution HLA typing
- Patients who also have an eligible 8/8 MUD adult donor based on confirmatory highution HLA typing are eligible for randomization to Arm A or Arm B.
- Patients who do not have an eligible MUD donor are eligible for enrollment to ArmC
- All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed
consent
- All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute(NCI) requirements for human studies must be met
- Co-Enrollment on other trials
- Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if already enrolledher protocols for treatment of high risk and/or relapsed ALL, AML and MDS.This is including, but not limited to, COG AAML1831, COG AALL1821, the EndRADTrial, as well as local institutional trials. We will collect information on all
- Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if receivingunotherapy prior to transplant as a way to achieve remission and bridge to. This includes chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy andher immunotherapies
- PATIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT:
- Karnofsky Index or Lansky Play-Performance Scale >= 60 on pre-transplant evaluation.Karnofsky scores must be used for patients >= 16 years of age and Lansky scores for=< 16 years of age (within 4 weeks of starting therapy)
- A serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows:6 months to < 1 year: 0.5 mg/dL (Male); 0.5 mg/dL (Female)
- to < 2 years: 0.6 mg/dL (Male); 0.6 mg/dL (Female)
- to < 6 years: 0.8 mg/dL (Male); 0.8 mg/dL (Female)
6 to < 10 years: 1 mg/dL (Male); 1 mg/dL (Female) 10 to < 13 years: 1.2 mg/dL (Male);1.2 mg/dL (Female) 13 to < 16 years: 1.5 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female) >= 16 years:1.7 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female)- OR- A 24 hour urine Creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2- OR- A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. GFR must be performed usingdirect measurement with a nuclear blood sampling method OR direct small moleculeclearance method (iothalamate or other molecule per institutional standard)- Note: Estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine, cystatin C or other estimatesare not acceptable for determining eligibility- Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) aspartate aminotransferase [AST] orserum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) aminotransferase [ALT] < 5 x upper limitof normal (ULN) for age- Total bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL, unless attributable to Gilbert's Syndrome- Shortening fraction of >= 27% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA)- OR- Ejection fraction of >= 50% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA), choice oftest according to local standard of care- Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), andcorrected carbon monoxide diffusing capability (DLCO) must all be >= 50% of predictedby pulmonary function tests (PFTs).- For children who are unable to perform for PFTs (e.g., due to age ordevelopmental delay), the criteria are: no evidence of dyspnea at rest, oxygen(O2) saturation (Sat) > 92% on room air by pulse oximetry, not on supplemental O2at rest, and not on supplemental O2 at rest- ALL high-risk in first complete remission (CR1) for whom transplant is indicated.Examples include: induction failure, treatment failure as per minimal residual diseaseby flow cytometry > 0.01% after consolidation and not eligible for AALL1721 orAALL1721 not available/unwilling to enroll, hypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes) with MRD+> 0.01% after induction, persistent or recurrent cytogenetic or molecular evidence ofdisease during therapy requiring additional therapy after induction to achieveremission (e.g. persistent molecular BCR-ABL positivity), T cell ALL with persistentMRD > 0.01% after consolidation.- ALL in second complete remission (CR2) for whom transplant is indicated. Examplesinclude: B-cell: early (=< 36 months from initiation of therapy) bone marrow (BM)relapse, late BM relapse (>= 36 months) with MRD >= 0.1% by flow cytometry after firstre-induction therapy; T or B-cell: early (< 18 months) isolated extramedullary (IEM),late (>= 18 months) IEM, end-Block 1 MRD >= 0.1%; T-cell or Philadelphia chromosomepositive (Ph+): BM relapse at any time- ALL in >= third complete remission (CR3)- Patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) cells for whomtransplant is indicated. Examples include: transplant for consolidation of CART, lossof CART persistence and/or B cell aplasia < 6 months from infusion or have otherevidence (e.g., MRD+) that transplant is indicated to prevent relapse- AML in CR1 for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include those deemed high riskfor relapse as described in AAML1831:- FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 without bZIP CEBPA, NPM1- FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 with concurrent bZIP CEBPA or NPM1 and withevidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction- Presence of RAM phenotype or unfavorable prognostic markers (other than FLT3/ITD)per cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next generationsequencing (NGS) results, regardless of favorable genetic markers, MRD status orFLT3/ITD mutation status- AML without favorable or unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular features but withevidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction- Presence of a non-ITD FLT3 activating mutation and positive MRD (>= 0.05%) at endof Induction 1 regardless of presence of favorable genetic markers.- AML in >= CR2- MDS with < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (if available) on thepre-transplant bone marrow evaluation- Complete remission (CR) is defined as < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (ifavailable) on the pre-transplant bone marrow evaluation with minimum sustainedabsolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 300 cells/microliter for 1 week or ANC > 500cells/microliter. We will be collecting data from all approaches to MRD evaluationperformed including NGS and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- DONOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:- Matched Unrelated Donors:Unrelated donor candidates must be matched at high resolution at a minimum of 8/8 alleles(HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1). One-antigen HLA mismatches are not permitted. HLA matching ofadditional alleles is recommended according to National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)guidelines, but will be at the discretion of local centers- Haploidentical Matched Family Members:- Minimum match level full haploidentical (at least 5/10; HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1,-DQB1 alleles). The following issues (in no particular order) should beconsidered in choosing a haploidentical donor:- Absent or low patient donor-specific antibodies (DSA)- Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any anti-donor HLA antibody bysolid phase immunoassay should be < 2000. Donors with higher levels arenot eligible.- If a screening assay against pooled HLA antigens is used, positiveresults must be followed with specificity testing using a singleantigen assay. The MFI must be < 2000 unless the laboratory hasvalidated higher threshold values for reactivity for HLA antigens(such as HLA-C, -DQ, and -DP), that may be enhanced inconcentration on the single antigen assays. Donor anti- recipientantibodies are of unknown clinical significance and do not need tobe sent or reported.- Consult with Study Chair for the clinical significance of anyrecipient anti-donor HLA antibody.- If centers are unable to perform this type of testing, pleasecontact the Study Chair to make arrangements for testing.- If killer immunoglobulin testing (KIR) is performed: KIR status by mismatch,KIR-B, or KIR content criteria can be used according to institutionalguidelines.- ABO compatibility (in order of priority):- Compatible or minor ABO incompatibility- Major ABO incompatibility- CMV serostatus:- For a CMV seronegative recipient: the priority is to use a CMVseronegative donor when feasible- For a CMV seropositive recipient: the priority is to use a CMVseropositive donor when feasible- Age: younger donors including siblings/half-siblings, and second degreerelatives (aunts, uncles, cousins) are recommended, even if < 18 years- Size and vascular access appropriate by center standard for peripheral blood stem cell(PBSC) collection if needed- Haploidentical matched family members: screened by center health screens and found tobe eligible- Unrelated donors: meet eligibility criteria as defined by the NMDP or other unrelateddonor registries. If the donor does not meet the registry eligibility criteria but anacceptable eligibility waiver is completed and signed per registry guidelines, thedonor will be considered eligible for this study- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative- Not pregnant- MUD donors and post-transplant cyclophosphamide haplo donors should be asked toprovide BM. If donors refuse and other donors are not available, PBSC is allowed.TCR-alpha beta/CD19 depleted haplo donors must agree to donate PBSC- Must give informed consent:- Haploidentical matched family members: Institution standard of care donor consentand Protocol-specific Donor Consent for Optional Studies- Unrelated donors: standard NMDP Unrelated Donor ConsentExclusion Criteria:- PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR ENROLLMENT:- Patients with genetic disorders (generally marrow failure syndromes) prone tosecondary AML/ALL with known poor outcomes because of sensitivity to alkylator therapyand/or TBI are not eligible (Fanconi Anemia, Kostmann Syndrome, DyskeratosisCongenita, etc). Patients with Downs syndrome because of increased toxicity withintensive conditioning regimens.- Patients with any obvious contraindication to myeloablative HCT at the time ofenrollment- Female patients who are pregnant are ineligible as many of the medications used inthis protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants- Sexually active patients of reproductive potential who have not agreed to use aneffective contraceptive method for the duration of their study participation- PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT:- Patients with uncontrolled fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections areexcluded. Patients with history of fungal disease during chemotherapy may proceed ifthey have a significant response to antifungal therapy with no or minimal evidence ofdisease remaining by computed tomography (CT) evaluation- Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia or any other active site ofextramedullary disease at the time of initiation of the conditioning regimen are notpermitted.- Note: Those with prior history of CNS or extramedullary disease, but with noactive disease at the time of pre-transplant workup, are eligible- Pregnant or breastfeeding females are ineligible as many of the medications used inthis protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants
Updated on
13 Sep 2024.
Study ID: ASCT2031, PHO-COG-ASCT2031, 18915
Please visit our main page to search for other studies you may be interested in.
If you need help finding a study or have any questions, please contact us at inhealth@iu.edu